Einstein’s Local Realism vs. Bohr’s Instrumental Anti-Realism: The Debate Between Two Titans in the Quantum Theory Arena





Einstein; Bohr; Realism; Anti-realism; Quantum Mechanics.


The objective of this article is to demonstrate how the historical debate between materialism and idealism, in the field of Philosophy, extends, in new clothes, to the field of Quantum Physics characterized by realism and anti-realism. For this, we opted for a debate, also historical, between the realism of Albert Einstein, for whom reality exists regardless of the existence of the knowing subject, and Niels Bohr, for whom we do not have access to the ultimate reality of the matter, unless conditioning it to the existence of an observer endowed with rationality, position adopted in the Interpretation of Complementarity (1927) – posture that was expanded in 1935 when Bohr assumed a “relationalist” conception, according to which the quantum state is defined by the relationship between the quantum object and the entire measuring device. This is an extremely important debate, as it further consolidates the results of nascent Quantum Mechanics, guaranteeing Bohr the leadership of the orthodoxy based on the interpretation of complementarity. Here, when dealing with Quantum Theory, we will not make any distinction between the terms Quantum Physics, Quantum Theory or Quantum Mechanics. The entire discussion will be held under the name “Quantum Theory”. Theory that tries to analyze and describe the behavior of physical systems of reduced dimensions, close to the sizes of molecules, atoms and subatomic particles. We hope that the reader will appreciate the genius of these two titans in this field of Physics when they magnificently formulate the arguments that support the object of their defenses.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Eduardo Simões, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR), São Carlos – SP, Brasil. Professor da Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil.


BAKER, Joanne. 50 ideias de física quântica que você precisa conhecer. Trad. Rafael Garcia. São Paulo: Planeta, 2015.

BERKELEY, G. Principles of Human Knowledge. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Howard Robinson. New York: Oxford University, 1996.

BOHR, N. The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Supplement to “Nature”, April 14, 1928. p. 580-590. Available in: https://www.nature.com/articles/121580a0.pdf. Access in: Jul. 10, 2020.

BOHR, N. Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933–1958). In: “Albert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist”. (Ed. P.A. Schilpp), The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VII, Evanston, Illinois 1949, p. 201-241. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876050308703797?via%3Dihub. Access in: Jul. 12, 2020.

BOHR, N. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 48, Oct. 15, 1935. p. 695-702.

BROWN, Harvey R. O Debate Einstein-Bohr sobre a mecânica quântica. In: Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência. 2, São Paulo: UNICAMP, p. 51-81, 1981.

BUNGE, M. Física e Filosofia. Trad. Gita K. Guinsburg. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2000. (Coleção Debates – Filosofia da Ciência)

DA SILVA, V. C.; BRANCO, J. C. A recepção de Kant na filosofia da física de heisenberg. Griot: Revista de Filosofia, v. 19, n. 3, 2019, p. 266-279

EINSTEIN, A; PODOLSKY, B; ROSEN, N. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, May 15, 1935. p. 777-780.

HEISENBERG. W. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Planned and Edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1958.

HERBERT, N. Quantum Reality: beyond the new physics. Garden City: Anchor Press, 1985.

HOLTON, Gerald. The Roots of Complementarity. Daedalus, 99 (4), The Making of Modern Science: Biographical Studies, 1970. p. 151-197. Available in: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37902465 Access in: Jul. 11, 2020.

JAMMER, M. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. Nova York: Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1974.

LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm von (1646-1716). Omnia Opera. Genebra: de Tournes, 1768.

PESSOA JR. Conceitos de Física Quântica. 4. ed. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2019. Vols. I e II

PESSOA JR. Física Quântica: entenda as diversas interpretações da física quântica. 2007-2011. Disponível em: http://opessoa.fflch.usp.br/sites/opessoa.fflch.usp.br/files/Vya-Quantica-Tudo.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2020.

PESSOA JR., O. O Sujeito na Física Quântica. In: OLIVEIRA, E.C. (org.). Epistemologia, Lógica e Filosofia da Linguagem – Ensaios de Filosofia Contemporânea. Feira de Santana/BA: Núcleo de Estudos Filosóficos – UEFS, 2001, pp. 157-96.

SCHRÖDINGER, E. Science and Humanism. With a foreword by Roger Penrose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.

WHEELER, J. A.; ZUREK, W. H. (Orgs.). Quantum Theory and Measurement. New Jersey: Princeton Un. Press, 1983.




Como Citar

SIMÕES, E. Einstein’s Local Realism vs. Bohr’s Instrumental Anti-Realism: The Debate Between Two Titans in the Quantum Theory Arena. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 332–348, 2021. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v21i2.2306. Disponível em: https://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2306. Acesso em: 1 dez. 2021.