Russell’s propositional analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1794

Keywords:

Russell; Logical atomism; Propositional analysis.

Abstract

The present paper explains what Russell’s method of logical analysis is and how it works in the context of logical atomism, pointing out the objectives and precepts that he considers when he analyzes propositions. After exploring the general development of analysis in his work, I examine two examples of propositional analysis: that of relational propositions and that of propositions which contain descriptions. In both cases, I have noted that Russell seeks to break with a logic which was restricted to the subject-predicate form, once he thought it was the origin of a defective grammar and, thus, also of many of the traditional metaphysical problems. In this sense, assuming that there may be a wide variety of forms, he says that the objective of the analysis would be precisely to identify what is the logical form and what are the constituents of a proposition, which would serve to bring in evidence the misunderstandings of language and so to dissolve metaphysical problems. Therefore, in the present paper, I detail under which theoretical precepts Russell accomplishes this goal in the two specified examples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Murilo Garcia de Matos Amaral, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador – BA, Brasil.

References

BEANEY, Michael. “Analysis”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018, In:<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/analysis/>.

DUTRA, Luiz Henrique. Teoria do Conhecimento, Florianópolis, 2008.

FREGE, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, 1879; reedit. In: Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Angelelli org.). Hildesheim: Zürich, New York: George Olms Verlag, 1998.

GRIFFIN, Nicholas. “What did Russell learn from Leibniz?”, In: Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, Volume 2, Number 1, 2013.

KLEMENT, Kevin. “Russell's Logical Atomism”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015, In: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/logical-atomism/>.

LASSALLE CASANAVE, Abel. “Dos Modelos de Analisis Filosófico”, In: o que nos faz pensar, no 17, dezembro de 2013.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. New York: Dover Publication, 1993.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. My Philosophical Development. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1959.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. Principia Mathematica (with A. N. Whitehead). 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925–27 (First edition 1910–13).

RUSSELL, Bertrand. The Principles of Mathematics. 2nd ed. London: W. W. Norton, 1937.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. The Analysis of Mind. London: Allen & Unwin, 1921.

RUSSELL, Bertrand.“Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description” (1911), In: Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: Longmans, 1918, p. 152–167.

RUSSELL, Bertrand.“Le Réalisme analytique” (1911), In: Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, V. 6, Logical and Philosophical Papers, 1909–1913, ed. J. G. Slater. London: Allen & Unwin, 1992, p. 409–432. [RA]

RUSSELL, Bertrand.“Logical Atomism” (1924), In: Logic and Knowledge, ed. R.C. Marsh. London: Allen & Unwin, 1956, p. 323–43.

RUSSELL, Bertrand.“On Denoting” (1905), In: Logic and Knowledge, ed. R.C. Marsh. London: Allen & Unwin, 1956, p. 41–56.

RUSSELL, Bertrand.“On Propositions: What They Are, and How They Mean” (1919), In: Logic and Knowledge, ed. R.C. Marsh. London: Allen & Unwin, 1956, p. 285–320.

RUSSELL, Bertrand.“The Philosophy of Logical Atomism” (1918), In: Logic and Knowledge, ed. R.C. Marsh. London: Allen & Unwin, 1956, p. 177–281.

SALLES, João Carlos. Análise e Gramática. Salvador: Quarteto Editora, 2018.

WOOD, Allan. “Russell’s philosophy: a study of its development”, In: RUSSELL, Bertrand. My Philosophical Development. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1959.

Published

2020-06-12

How to Cite

AMARAL, Murilo Garcia de Matos. Russell’s propositional analysis. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 258–280, 2020. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1794. Disponível em: https://www3.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/1794. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles