Enactivism and practical knowledge

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v19i3.1296

Keywords:

Enactivism; Phenomenology; Heidegger; Merleau-Ponty; Francisco Varela.

Abstract

In Being and Time (1927), Heidegger claims the primordial knowledge of Dasein comes from coping with mundane beings. Merleau-Ponty, in turn, argues on Phenomenology of Perception (1945) for knowledge as a bodily activity non translatable in propositional terms. Later, on What Computers Can’t Do (1972), Hubert Dreyfus use the work of both to point out the flaws of cognitivism, the dominant paradigm in early days of artificial intelligence. Finally, The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (1991) by Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch brings enactivism as an attempt to take from cognitivism and connectionism the hegemony in cognitive sciences. That being said, the paper describes enactivism while showing its phenomenological heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rodrigo Benevides Barbosa Gomes, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)

Doutorando em Filosofia na Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFScar), São Carlos – SP, Brasil.

References

BARBARAS, Renaud. Francisco Varela: A new idea of perception and life. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences n. 1: pp. 127-132, 2002.

CARMAN, T. The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. London: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

CLARK, Andy. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2013.

DREYFUS, H. L. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.

DREYFUS, H. L. What Computers Still Can't Do: A critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.

DREYFUS, H. L. Why Heideggerian Artificial Intelligence failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. In: Philosophical Psychology. Londres, 20:2, 2007, p.247-268.

HEIDEGGER, M. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson. London: Blackwell, 1962.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. A Estrutura do Comportamento. Tradução de M. V. M. Aguiar. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. Fenomenologia da Percepção. Tradução de C. A. Ribeiro de Moura. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. The Structure of Behavior. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.

MOUTINHO, L. D. S. Razão e experiência: ensaio sobre Merleau-Ponty. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp. 2006.

SACRINI, M. A. F. Fenomenologia e Ontologia em Merleau-Ponty. Tese de Doutorado em Filosofia - Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, USP. São Paulo, 2008. THOMPSON, E. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

VARELA, F.; MATURANA, H. A Árvore do Conhecimento: as bases biológicas da compreensão humana. São Paulo: Ed. Palas Athena, 2001.

VARELA, F., THOMPSON, E. & ROSCHE, E. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1991.

VARELA, F.; WEBER, A. Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, N. 1: pp. 97-125, 2002

Published

2019-10-15

How to Cite

BENEVIDES BARBOSA GOMES, Rodrigo. Enactivism and practical knowledge. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 12–22, 2019. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v19i3.1296. Disponível em: https://www3.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/1296. Acesso em: 12 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles