The distinction legality-morality in the critical of Hegel to Kant

Abstract

This article has the objective to treat the critical of Hegel to Kant from the distinction between legality and morality. While Kant remains stuck to the formalism, Hegel points the relative principles to the content, because only from them can be established particular duties. Kant defines the right, good and fair from a procedure that aims at the universality. The distinction between legality and morality is made from their mobiles. The reason, in Kant, is not legislator because it is not worried about with "what should be done" but "how it should be done." The categorical imperative is the regulator and supervisor. Hegel criticizes the formalism of Kantian theory. The ethicity has as its major objective the liberation of indeterminacy, the immediacy and the natural. This occurs by introducing mediation and producing and producing, thereby,  the determination (social institutions).